Setting himself against the growing tendency to homogenize “Third World” literature and cultures, Aijaz Ahmad has produced a spirited critique of the major . In Theory: Nations, Classes, Literatures (Radical Thinkers) [Aijaz Ahmad] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. After the Second World War, . Aijaz Ahmad. London, Verso, pp. PDF download for Book Reviews: IN THEORY: CLASSES, NATIONS, LITERATURES. Aijaz, Article Information.
|Published (Last):||5 April 2013|
|PDF File Size:||2.81 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.32 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In his book In Theory: Please help by adding reliable sources.
Setting himself against the growing tendency to homogenize “Third World” literature and cultures, Aijaz Ahmad has produced a spirited critique of the major theoretical statements on “colonial discourse” and “post-colonialism,” dismantling many of the commonplaces and conceits that dominate contemporary cultural criticism.
Other editions – View all In Theory: Retrieved from ” https: Arab Media and Political Renewal: He also works as an editorial consultant with the Indian newsmagazine Frontline and as a senior news analyst for the Indian website Newsclick. A frequent contributor to Frontline magazine, he kn lives in New Delhi.
Contents Languages of Class Ideologies of Immigration. My library Help Advanced Book Search.
Furthermore, Ahmad asserts that by tracing Orientalist thought all the way back to Ancient Greece it becomes unclear in Said’s work whether Orientalism is a product of Colonialism, or whether Colonialism is, in fact, a product of Orientalism.
Contentious material about living persons thekry is unsourced or poorly sourced must be qhmad immediatelyespecially if potentially libelous or harmful. With lengthy considerations of, among others, Fredric Jameson, Edward Said, and the Subaltern Studies group, In Theory also contains brilliant analyses of the concept of Indian literature, of the genealogy of the term “Third World,” and of the conditions under which so-called “colonial discourse theory” emerged in metropolitan intellectual circles.
After the Second World War, nationalism emerged as the principle tgeory of resistance to Western imperialism in a variety of regions from the Indian subcontinent to Africa, to parts of Latin America and the Pacific Rim.
This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification.
This in turn leads Jameson to make hasty and untenable generalizations about how all “third world literature’ would necessarily function as a national allegory that according to Jameson works as resistance to a system of global postmodernism. Views Read Edit View history.
No eBook available Amazon. Selected pages Title Page. The book contains an especially polemical critique of Frederic Jameson ‘s argument in ‘Third World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism” where Ahmad attacks Jameson on the grounds that Jameson’s argument is insufficiently theorized in its use of terms like “Third World” which appears to be defined purely in terms of its experience of colonialism.
Aijaz Ahmad born is a Marxist philosopher, literary theorist and political commentator. After his education he worked in various universities in US and Canada.
In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures – Aijaz Ahmad – Google Books
Classes, Nations, Literatures Cultural Studies. The book also contains a lengthy critique of Edward Said’s Orientalism which Ahmad argues reproduces the very Liberal Humanist tradition that it seeks to undermine in its selection of Western canonized texts that are critiqued for their Orientalism, as this upholds the idea that Western culture is represented in its entirety through those very texts. Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone.
This page was last edited on 18 Novemberat January Tneory how and when to remove this template message. With the Bandung Conference and the formation of the Non-Aligned Movement, many of Europe’s former colonies banded together to form a common bloc, aligned with neither the advanced capitalist “First World” nor with the socialist “Second World.
Ahmad in his book expresses his chagrin at how his critique of Jameson has been appropriated by Postcolonial scholars as an attack on Marxism, while Ahmad contends that he takes issue with Jameson simply because his use of Marxism in the essay on Third World Literature is not rigorous enough.
Erudite and lucid, Ahmad’s remapping of the terrain of cultural theory is certain to provoke passionate response.
Retrieved 6 December