The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) designed to be a comprehensive assessment of physical. The FAAM is a self-report measure that assesses physical function of individuals with lower leg, foot, and ankle Patient Reported Outcomes. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a region-specific, non–disease- specific outcome instrument that possesses many of the clinimetric qualities.

Author: Shakagrel Yozshumi
Country: Kosovo
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 8 October 2007
Pages: 82
PDF File Size: 14.76 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.22 Mb
ISBN: 301-9-22193-791-7
Downloads: 93819
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kigarr

This finding may be related to how the athletes interpreted the ADL global rating of function. Four instruments met the criteria of this review: This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Development and reliability of the Ankle Instability Instrument. A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle.

Additionally, this study was designed to provide validity evidence for interpretation of FAAM scores.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. Physiopedia is not a substitute outcomd professional advice or expert medical services from a qualified healthcare provider. However, the clinician must remember that the primary function of the FAAM is to measure changes in status from one point to another rather than to classify subjects based on status.

The FAAM is a reliable, responsive, and valid measure of physical function for individuals with a broad range of musculoskeletal disorders of the lower leg, foot, and ankle. Open in a separate window.

Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Subjective information from self-reported outcome instruments can provide valuable information for clinicians treating individuals with ankle instability.

Retrieved from ” https: Further testing that offers evidence for validity, reliability, and responsiveness, including defining values for the minimal detectable change and the minimal clinically important difference, in this population is needed. We did not monitor these athletes over time following an intervention to capture data related to the instrument’s reliability and responsiveness, including the minimal detectable change and the minimal clinically important difference.


Construct validity While evidence for content relates directly to what the items measure, evidence for construct validity assesses how the scores on the instrument relate to other measures of the construct.

Conversely, data related to outcoome minimal detectable change and the minimal clinically important difference have been identified for the FAAM; however, these data are specific to the population and timeframes for which they were established. All athletes in the healthy group and 4 athletes in the CAI group categorically rated their ankles as normal. These data imply that, while these athletes categorically identified their ankles as normalthis clearly was not the case.

Free online Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) score calculator

Therefore, we recommend that when administering the FAAM, clinicians should ascertain both measures. Original Editors – Niels Verbeeck. A outco,e of 53 athletes expressed interest in the study.

That is usually the journal article where the information was first stated. M, Brandsson S, Karlsson J.

Free online Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) score calculator – orthotoolkit

A noteworthy finding was that for the relationships between each FAAM subscale score and global rating of function, correlation values were weaker when only the CAI group was examined. Although Hale and Hertel 16 identified the FADI as sensitive to change in recreationally active participants with CAI, they did not provide specific data related to the minimal detectable change and the minimal clinically important difference.


This measuree is multiplied by to get a percentage. Although we cannot be certain why 4 participants identified their ankles as normalwe suspect that the measre on the FAAM may have influenced them.

M, Sterner R, Kuligowski L. These results imply that collegiate athletes with CAI have fewer limitations with ADLs than with sports activities and that the sports subscale can elucidate these limitations. Therefore, although they may score high on the ADL items of the FAAM, they may rate global function lower because of their limitation in sports.

If the subject answers all 21 items, the highest potential score is The Meaxure and sports subscale scores of the FAAM were greater in healthy athletes than in athletes with CAI and greater in athletes who classified their ankles as normalthan those who did measurf.

Evidence of content validity is determined by the specific items on the instrument and what they measure. We analyzed our data with SPSS version Before data collection began, all subjects read and signed a consent form.

Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability

This value is then multiplied by to get a percentage. Support Center Support Center. Following screening, each participant completed the self-reported outcome instrument, which included the FAAM, 2 global ratings of function, and 1 overall categorical rating of function. On the categorical rating scale, participants outdome their ankles as normalnearly normalabnormalor severely abnormal.