IJbrary of Confess Catalcguing-in-Publicalion Da/a Furr, Cirover C. (Grover Cart) Khrushchev Lied: The Evidence That Every “Revelaiion” of Stalin’s (and. Khrushchev Lied by Grover Furr; Published by Erythros Press and Media, LLC. Grover Carr Furr III (born April 3, ) is an American professor of Medieval English literature He is mostly known for his book Khrushchev Lied. The book.

Author: Faerg Mazusho
Country: Timor Leste
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 1 May 2004
Pages: 442
PDF File Size: 16.60 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.91 Mb
ISBN: 152-8-37743-578-3
Downloads: 73364
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kigale

Frinovskii’s statement makes it clear this was no fabrication. Having spent the past ten years buried in the infamous Soviet archives or at least, those sections of it which are now available to be studied — much of the archives are still too politically-charged to be considered for opening by the current Russian government he has now produced a book, based on his research, which makes an outrageous claim:.

Another possibility is that his fate was intended to warn others to groer them to cooperate with Khrushchev’s “rehabilitations”, kheushchev what he wanted them to say. No, it would be a display of naivete to consider this the work of Ezhov alone.

If you begin to lie khushchev to testify falsely, blame yourself. And that appears to be correct: Mass Repressions generally 6. It was strange company for an “innocent” leader of the Komsomol to be keep- ing!

Sialin, Maitmiig tMshevim New York: Yet Mikoian complained that khrushcev and col- lective leadership were never achieved at any lime under Khrushchev or Brezhnev. Refresh and try again.

David Horowitz listed him as one of the ” most dangerous academics in America”, and criticizes him for believing that “it was morally wrong for the United States to bring about the collapse of the Soviet Union”, denying the Katyn massacre, Stalin’s alleged antisemitismand on a number of other historical issues.

There is good evidence suggesting that it was precisely Eikhe who led the u’ay for the First Secretaries in demanding extraordinary powers to shoot thousands of people and lid thousands more to what became the GU- LAG – that it was, in fact, Eikhe who began the mass repression that Khrushchev is claiming to denounce. Commanders Killed 88 The OGPU is four years behind in this matter.

We can name many individuals who, in their time, joined the Trotskyites; however, these same individuals took an active part in the workers’ movement before the Revolution, during the Socialist October Revolution itself, and also in the consolidation of the victory of this greatest of revolutions. A number of articles have appeared in the popular press, somi by Khrusshchev family, setting forth the view that he was unjustly accusec and that Ol’ga P.


Maxim Gorky used the term in his sketch “The Taudde Chersonese” “Khersones Tavricheskii” in the “Oath of the Chersonesers,” a sketch published in But their own researdi disproves this claim.

I have philosophized that the severe years of fighting have passed.

His general argument is outlined in several articles of his and in reviews of the book. Of course these do not prove his guilt, all the more so since they are “Ezhov” documents, confessions made during Ezhov’s tenure as heacloi the NKVD — and we have seen above the kind of stuff that went on un- der Ezhov.

Khrushchev deliberately concealed from his audience the dci thai the Navy had decided this was disinformation intended to mislead the Soviet leadership! This was certainly the case with many others. This letter – really a declaration of a complaint of mistreat- ment – exists. That implies that some were not, although the Commission did not specify which were guilt ‘, except for Ezhov.

Furr accepts this as a likely primary motivation, but he adds to this another, more disturbing, possible motivation. It concludes with the single sentence: Both Eikhe and E. This is consistent with Zhukov’s deductions. Accordingly, I have organized my report on this research in a somewhat unusual way.

Stalin never said that “as we march forward towards socialism class war must sharpen. Vorontsov’s letter 86 The Author had supported most of his claims with primary sources and left many links to those sources in his book so you can look them up online.

Grover Furr – Wikipedia

They have the direct support of our enemies beyond the bounds of the U. Given what we know from Jansen and Petrov’s summary of the documents tliey got to see, it seems clear that Ezhov and Eikhe had some kind of falling out.

A khrushcjev of the origins of the “cult” is beyond the scope of kgrushchev article. Khrushchev’s high-handedness was a main reason for his re- moval by the Central Committee in Leviathan rated it it was amazing Feb 27, About the Author Grover Furr began studying Russian language and literature as a teenager and became interested in Soviet history about a decade later.


And I am a living person and my nerves are strained to the utmost. The notion was too monstrous. Stalin, with his henchman Beria, were the “bad guys” – the Party First Secretaries were trying to resist them!

Kosior, Chubar’, Postyshev, and Kosarev are listed in that precise or in a letter of March 16,to Stalin from V. He believes that Ezhov was working with the First Secretaries on this, and would have arrested and executed Stalin if Stalin had refused them Nov, 16 ; Nov. This is not a conclusion which he has hitherto been building towards, nor is it one that he makes much, if any, sustained attempt to support in the page and a half that he discusses it.

Grover Furr

If this khrushcuev all, we might hypothetically assume that Khrushchev and Mikoian had truly respected Stalin to the point of being in awe of him.

The formula “enemy of the people” was specifically introduced for the purpose of physicallyannihilating such individuals. Futtheimore, it was Khrushchev who replaced Postyshev grovver candidate member of Politburo. Trotskyism thus re-emerged as a force within the working-class movement and, often trading off its apparently sharp-eyed analysis of the Soviet Union, rose to become one of the most persistent features of the western political spectrum.

But some years later, when socialism in our country was fundamentally constructed, when the exploiting classes were generally liquidated, when the Soviet social structure had radically changed, when the social basis for political movements and groups hostile to the party had violently contracted, when the ideological opponents of the party were long since defeated politically – then the repression directed against them began.

In this passage Khrushchev implied, though without stating it overtly, that Stalin was involved in Kirov’s murder.

EPM | Khrushchev Lied

It is not evidence that the defendant was innocent. If I want to get a fair historical assessment of Hideki Tojo, I won’t ask the leader of a Japanese Nationalist party just like I wouldn’t ask this guy if I wanted a fair historical assessment of Stalin. Nadezhda Konstantinovna and Vladimir Ilich were talking about something.