Meaning: "sense or state of being related," from relation + -ship. Specifically of romantic or sexual relationships by See more definitions. origins of self-reported romantic attachment styles in previous relationships. Rosaceae have shown the probable origin and relationship of many species. The larger genera such as Rosa, Rubus, and Prunus each contain a number of.
Peer interaction of young children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development ;53 1. The emergence of same-sex affiliative preferences among preschool peers: Child Development ;55 5: Growing up apart, coming together. Harvard University Press; Affiliative structures in preschool peer groups. Social Development ;5 2: Developmental Psychology ;17 4: Parents' management of preschooler's peer relations: Is it related to children's social competence? Developmental Psychology ;24 1: Temporal reliability and validity of three sociometric status assessments with young children.
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science ;18 2: Boivin M, Hymel S. Peer experiences and social self-perceptions: Developmental Psychology ;33 1: Toward a process view of peer rejection and harassment. Juvonen J, Graham S, eds. Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized. What we know and what we can do.
'Special relationship' - the meaning and origin of this phrase
Alsaker FD, Valkanover S. Early diagnosis and prevention of victimization in kindergarten. Relational and physical forms of peer victimization in preschool.
Developmental Psychology ;35 2: Cause or consequence of school maladjustment? Child Development ;67 4: Landau S, Moore LA. Social skill deficits in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
School Psychology Review ;20 2: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin ; 1: A behavioral analysis of emerging social status in boys' groups. Child Development ;54 6: Behavioral antecedents of peer social status.
Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology ;36 1: Individual-group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups of boys: The social misfit revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ;69 2: Developmental and contextual analyses.
Child Development ;61 5: The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review ;19 1: Aggressive behavior in preschoolers' social networks: Do birds of a feather flock together? Early Childhood Research Quarterly ;11 3: Peer relationships of young children: Affiliative choices and the shaping of aggressive behavior. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology ;26 2: Boivin M, Vitaro F. The impact of peer relationships on aggression in childhood: Inhibition through coercion or promotion through peer support.
Coercion and punishment in long-term perspectives. Poulin F, Boivin M. The role of proactive and reactive aggression in the formation and development of boys' friendships. Developmental Psychology ;36 2: The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and victimization by peers in predicting loneliness and depressed mood in childhood.
Development and Psychopathology ;7 4: Child Development ;58 4: The consequences of childhood peer rejection. Oxford University Press; Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk?
Psychological Bulletin ; 3: Peer victimisation at school and the health of secondary school students. BritishJournal of Educational Psychology ;69 1: Variations in peer victimization: Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. I come to the crux of what I have traveled here to say. Neither the sure prevention of war, nor the continuous rise of world organization will be gained without what I have called the fraternal association of the English-speaking peoples.
Churchill did coin the phrase, but in fact he had already used it before that speech.
Whilst the degree of closeness between the nations is largely determined by judgments of mutual political, military and trading benefits, the personal factor has always had a strong influence. It has always been a chicken and egg situation and it frequently hasn't been clear which has come first - policy or friendship; for example, it is reported that Bill Clinton and John Major didn't like each other and it is the case that the period of their time together in office didn't result in especially close ties between the two nations.
It is also reported that Lyndon Johnson and Harold Wilson were rather distant with each other at a time that the British government refused to support the USA over Vietnam. How well they liked each other personally isn't well recorded, although in the numerous photographs of them taken at the Yalta conference they seem to be enjoying each other's company.
Mind you, like the old joke about what difference there might have been if Khrushchev had been shot rather than JFK - "I doubt that Mrs. Khrushchev would have married Aristotle Onassis", they appear quite pally with Stalin is those pictures too - and neither country opted for a special relationship with the USSR. Other times when the special relationship has flourished are during the periods in office of Harold Macmillan and John F. Kennedy and of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. More recently the relationship, although on the face of it an unlikely one, between Tony Blair and George Bush has been particularly close.